Steven
Crain’s Nevada Clark County ,
Nevada
The Clark
County District Attorney’s office relied on hearsay (NRS 51.385(2)(c)). LaGina Hyman had incentive to lie so as to
please her vindictive mother (Regina Hyman) and so that LaGina would not get
spanked. On Page 78, of the Court
transcripts, LaGina Hyman stated that if she lies her mother (Regina
On Page 52
(Lines 17 – 23, inclusive) Regina Hyman states “Gina (referring to her daughter
(LaGina) has never really told me (referring to Regina
LaGina Hyman
also stated her mom (Regina Hyman) also told her what to say. See Page 78, Lines 22 – 25, inclusive.
Clark County
Deputy District Attorney Mary Kay Holthus and Las Vegas Police Detectives Jon
Scott and Kevin Morgenstern also coached LaGina and Regina Hyman as to what to
say regarding Steven Crain.
On Page 58
(Line 21 – 25, inclusive) and continuing to Line 1 - 4 (inclusive) of Page 59,
of the transcripts, LaGina Hyman admitted to not knowing the difference between
the truth and telling a lie.
On Page 64,
LaGina Hyman twice admitted that she did not see Steven Crain in the courtroom,
despite the fact that she had a clear view of the courtroom and Steven Crain
was seated at the Defendant’s table. How
is it that LaGina Hyman, who had prior seen Steven Crain cannot recognize him
in the courtroom?
Steven
Crain’s Habeas Corpus Case stems from an alleged attempted lewdness crime that
allegedly took place on January 30, 2000 . The alleged victim was a minor (LaGina
Hyman). LaGina Hyman’s mother (Regina
Hyman) falsely filed a police report against Steven Crain, as a way to
retaliate against Steven Crain, since Mr. Crain would not baby-sit for Regina
Hyman’s daughter for free. Additionally,
Regina Hyman admits in the 2000 Court transcripts that she (Regina Hyman) has a
history of filing false police reports against men who do no give her things or
do thing for free for her. Incidentally,
it must be also noted that the Clark County District Attorney’s Office gave
Regina Hyman immunity from her multiple drug charges as well as paid her money
to knowingly file this false police report against Steven Crain and to
calculatingly provide perjured testimony against actually innocent Steven
Crain. At the time of the 2000 case, the
Clark County District Attorney never mentioned that their office had a policy
of paying moneys to alleged victims for perjured testimony. This policy was recently disclosed.
On February 2, 2000 , LaGina Hyman was
examined by Sunrise Medical
Center Las
Vegas , Nevada
On Pages 184
and 185 of the Preliminary Hearing Report, dated May 8, 2000 , it says that Dr. Conner said that there was
no recent trauma to LaGina Hyman’s vaginal area, Dr. Conner says that LaGina
Hyman has vaginitis.
On Page 172
of the Hearing Report, Detective Scott shows his (Scott) discrimination/bias
against Steven Crain, because Detective Scott does not like sex offender and/or
those accused of sex offenses and that is what Steven Crain was being charged
with. Detective Scott’s bias
contaminated his (Scott) report and Detective Scott even admits to leading
Regina Hyman and LaGina Hyman what to say in their statement, just like
Detective Scott did to Dr. Conner.
Detective Scott admits that all of the interrogation was not taped,
allegedly because the recorder was not working.
One has to wonder if Detective Scott’s bias played a part in why the
full interrogation was not recorded.
Additionally, on Page 178 of the Hearing Report, Judge Douglas Smith
states “I guess for the record, I remember Gina (referring to LaGina Hyman)
saying that her (LaGina) pinky entered her (LaGina) vagina.” It must be noted that LaGina Hyman had
vaginitis which itches and therefore LaGina Hyman put her own finger in that
region to scratch it.
Throughout
the transcripts, LaGina Hyman could not remember which room, the alleged
incident happened, where Steven Crain was on the day the alleged incident
happened, and that her (LaGina) mother (Regina) had motive to put her (LaGina)
up to making these allegation. The fact
is no crime was committed. The fact is
Regina Hyman was angry, vindictive, and retaliatory (18 USC 1513) against
Steven Crain, since Steven Crain refused to continue to baby sit for Regina
Hyman’s daughters for free.
Regina Hyman
admitted she has a history of filing false sex/lewdness charges against men who
don’t give her things and/or do things for her for free, in Nevada California April 19, 2000
at 9 a.m. ).
Additionally, Mr. Crain should never have been prosecuted by the Clark
County District Attorney’s office, since even according to Dr. Conner’s
reports, LaGina Hyman actually suffered from vaginitis and that there were no
signs of recent trauma. And because of
the itchiness, caused by vaginitis, LaGina Hyman even admitted to the Judge
that she had scratched that area, with her own fingers. Even LaGina’s mother Regina
Mr. Crain
wants this court to also know that LVMPD Detective Kevin Morgenstern has lied
in other cases as well. One in
particular was the William Sites case. Early in his handling of the criminal case
against William Sites, Metro Detective Kevin Morgenstern suggested to Michelle Perkins
that she call her mother's husband (William Sites) and tell him (William Sites),
falsely, that they had found the remains of William Site’s wife (Jan
Sites). Michelle Perkins mother is Jan
Sites.
During the
April 19, 2000 hearing, Judge Douglas Smith did not allow Tony Liker (Steven
Crain’s then attorney) to question Regina Hyman about her drug charges, while
Regina was on the witness stand, since Regina’s testimony/answers/statements
would discredit Regina’s character and credibility, and show an abundants of
lies/perjury committed by Regina Hyman against Steven Crain.
It also
needs to be known that the Clark County, Nevada District Attorney’s office did
not disclose the fact that they (D. A.) gave Regina Hyman immunity from her
pending drug charges, if they (Regina 3-12-00 , time of arrest 2130.
Recently,
(year 2015) it has come to light, that the Clark County District Attorney’s
office had a secret policy of paying alleged victims money (ranging from
several hundreds of dollars to many thousands of dollars). This has been going on for more than 20
years. The Clark County District
Attorney will not disclose how much money they gave Regina Hyman. See Clark County
District Court Case No. 14-A-711233-W.
See NRCP Rules 59(a)(4) and 60(b)(2).
To show the
extent of lies that Regina Hyman will tell, in order to get free money, Regina Hyman even filed to get money from
Hurricane Katrina Aid Page, despite the fact that Regina Hyman did not live in
that area. This information was
discovered by a friend of Steven Crain.
Lastly, in
the year 2006, when Steven Crain was ordered by the Nevada Parole and Probation
and appointed therapists to take three polygraph tests, Steven Crain passed all
three, thus showing that Steven Crain is innocent. Said polygraph tests were administered by a
retired Las Vegas Police Detective.
Despite the fact of those result, and even given the fact that current
District Attorney Steven Wolfson is fully aware of Mr. Crain’s innocence, no
one has lifted a finger to officially declare Steven Crain innocent. Mr.
Crain passed a fourth polygraph in 2014.
